This month was a bit quieter on the wiki front than the last two, with most of the changes and updates happening behind the scenes or at the code level.
The major updates to the wiki this last month all revolve around the various infobox templates found on many wiki pages. Ever since the wiki was hit with the James bat and formatted to match the main site, many of the infobox templates had become a bit disfigured. A small handful, most notably the character template, were updated with some new formatting code to ensure that they displayed right again and formatted their information correctly. Over the last month, the remaining infobox templates have also been updated to the new formatting standard. As part of this the formatting for all those infoboxes, such as color and the like, has also been moved out of the templates themselves and into the CSS of the wiki system to make future edits far easier. Lastly, the two ship templates (Template:Ship and Template:Ship_(individual)) have been combined into the same template that contains all the fields of both. These two were very similar with only a few differences, so it made sense to condense them. Special thanks to Solari and his bot-fu for updating all the affected articles to source the combined template.
Another month, another Wikipedian of the Month and Featured Article.
Much like last month, this month’s WotM is getting singled out more for what type of updates are being done than the volume. Bentre Stahoes has done a lot of the nitty gritty updates to several of Clan Naga Sadow’s pages. These include quality passes on NPC’s and updates to vessels and other Clan items to reflect their current status with the unit. To say exactly what I said last month (because it still applies, and apparently Bentre was listening last time so who knows who I’ll reach this time…): The wiki strives to be an up to date resource for members to be able to find information on the Brotherhood and making these kind of house keeping updates is crucial to that. Clan summits and the members of the wiki staff won’t always get to this things right away, so anyone that is willing to pick up a hammer and help out building the wiki is always welcome!
This month’s Featured Article is about highlighting how an article doesn’t have to be long (or Atty-like as we say round the DJB these days) to be featured. The Khyron-class Star Destroyer article is fairly short as FA’s go, but it containes all the information on the subject in question. It also has proper wiki formatting, but most importantly sufficient linking to other articles. The latter of those two is what often keeps FA candidates from making the last push to be featured. I know that with the long articles it can be especially daunting a task to link them, but without all those links the wiki just turns into a collection of dead end pages.
The DJBWiki Manual of Style has been created and updated. This includes the sections on tense and naming policies that were outlined in last month’s report, along with a few other things. I want to highlight a new policy this time around, however, as it’s one that I think requires a shout out in general:
In keeping with this new policy, Andrelious went through all of our specifications transclusion articles and added the appropriate templates. As to what this means for the general user, this applies to text taken directly from either outside source. Statistics in infoboxes (such as how many guns a ship has) do not rise to the level of needing to be sourced. Only text taken directly from articles needs to be sourced under this policy.
This month’s wiki tip is about a template that is used on almost every character article: Template:Birthyear and Age. This templateis used in the birth field of character infoboxes to display your character’s current age. The wiki is set up to actually calculate the current fictional DJB year using the current date (Fun fact: between January 1st and April 12th the DJB year equals the current year minus 1977). With the current DJB year being known to the wiki, the template above can then calculate your character’s age if it knows what year your character was born. Characters that are born in years before the Battle of Yavin should specify BBY in the template while characters that are born after the Battle of Yavin should specify ABY in the template. Characters that were born the same year as the Battle of Yavin should use the year 0 as their birth year, and use BBY or ABY to denote if they were born before or after the Battle of Yavin in that year. This will then display your character’s year of birth followed by their age in parentheses. That age will then update in keeping with the DJB year from now until the wiki lights get turned off.
Update: As suggested by Terran Koul, this single template will now replace both Template:Birthyear and Age (BBY) and Template:Birthyear and Age (ABY).
My first report that isn’t as humongous. As I said at the top, things got a bit slow on the wiki, with myself and much of the staff being distracted by some outside work. This next month should be getting back a bit more to business as usual. Also, as a special factoid for people that read this far, I understand that the same layout bat that hit the website this last week will be coming to a wiki near you very soon.
You need to be logged in to post comments
Way to go Bentre and awesone report. :)
Congrats Bentre, and cool report. Looking forward to finally finishing my own longass wiki page :P
It shall be done with all haste. :D
Would you have any qualms about condensing those two age templates into a single one with an option for bby/aby?
I am glad to know the work is appreciated. I still have a long list of things to re-write/update but I hope that someone else will take the opportunity to outshine me.
@Terran: Actually, yes. It just required use of the #switch function (much like the character infobox templates). The new template has been deployed and the Wiki Tip has been updated.
"Atty-like."
But you still love me right? </3 I asked once about breaking the page up :P
Nice report and grats to people.
Great report, Slags! <3
There is nothing wrong with articles being long, and I hate breaking them up. If the content is about the subject of the article, it shouldn't be found in five different places. The point is, though, that I don't want every user on the wiki thinking they need to be Super Verbosity Man for a featured article. :)
When the mock-up refers to me getting a cookie, does it mean a real cookie, or does it mean that it takes about as long for the system to put a browser cookie on my system as it does for me to read the information?